Purveyors of finer speculative products since 2008; specializing in literate guesswork, slipshod argument, future games und so weiter

Showing posts with label Gates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gates. Show all posts

Monday, April 14, 2008

Bad futures

Well. Clearly I was wrong to hate on the Inqy for running an inflated-threat headline. What are editors to do when the only copy out there is inflated-threat copy? F'rinstance: NSC's Stephen Hadley on Fox Sunday:
"Iran is very active in the southern part of Iraq. They are training Iraqis in Iran who come into Iraq and attack our forces, Iraqi forces, Iraqi civilians. There are movements of equipment. There's movements of funds,"

Note the specificity! Why, it's as if the Weekly Standard predicted this very thing! Prediction, agitation, rearguard defense when it all goes south, recrimination: the cycle of future-baiting! (Or "-bating," -- Eds.)

We here at Dark Steer solemnly promise never to predict futures that would have undesirable side-effects if enacted. We further promise never to be wrong about anything consequential. Nor will we pursue a foreign policy detrimental to Dark Steer's image/standing in the world.

But back to Steve's kool-aid! It gets really weird! Viz.:

"So we have illegal militia in the southern part of the country that really are acting as criminal elements that are pressing the people down there."

Did he say "pressin'"? Or "o-pressin'"? Is the problem that Basra is overrun with criminal gangs? Like the 28 mere hooligans summarily executed yesterday? Because that's good for SCIRI and Maliki; it means their political legitimacy is not questioned. But wait, he also called dem bways "illegal militia," trained by Iran -- though by whom in Iran, where in Iran, with what materiel in Iran, like the SecDef sez, "we just don't know." Militia, tho' constitute a political problem, not one of law and order, thus:

Iraq's cabinet ratcheted up the pressure on anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr by approving draft legislation barring political parties with militias from participating in coming provincial elections.

...and after all the fuss we made about this not being about upcoming elections, it turns out that Badr vs. Sadr II follows the same pattern as the first time around: shut down the press office, assassinate the leadership, move in on the neighborhoods. Then, sit back and scratch your heads when the radicals you tried to isolate sweep parliamentary elections. Did the routine work in Palestine in 2006? It ain't work in Paris in 1788 either...
--
ds

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Inqy bashing

K:

Headline in this morning's Inquirer: U.S.: Iran hikes militia support. Shit we're used to hearing, albeit with modifications. Used to be "Iran supports Muqtada al-Sadr," and now al-Sayyid himself is beyond reproach, but Iran is still -- doing what exactly, funding? training? arming? feeding? -- supporting special groups. Conventional wisdom: Iran is the problem. I mean, despite the fact that SIIC -- formerly the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iran -- is Maliki's party, their militia the Badr is without any dispute trained in Iran; Iran brokered the Basra ceasefire; the last thing they want is for the Maliki government to fall, etc.

Nevermind. The new conventional wisdom is heightened support. Right under the AP's scaremongering set-up, "Iran's role has been one of the complicating factors," the secdef says:


"I think that there is some sense of an increased level of supply of weapons and
support to [special groups]. But whether it's a dramatic increase over recent
weeks, I just don't know."
Some sense, but I just don't know...like the drunk everybody believes, because listening to him is harmless; just let the man prattle on. Here's another. Take it easy. Anyway, it's a lot easier than listening to Rick Santorum. Gates is the guy who wakes up on your porch the next day talking to himself in a puddle of piss.

New Inquirer headline: SecDef: "Wait, Whose House Is This?"

Some historical matter. Clearly war with Iran will solve all our problems. Clean up human rights abuses, fix the border, protect unborn Christian babies, etc.:

And I remember the "Democrats Will Not Protect You From Osama Bin Laden" flyers from 2004 getting trotted out for 2006...but I don't have an image yet...

Anyway, I thought this shit was old hat. I mean, Sy Hersh hasn't written a piece on impending war with Iran since, what last April?

Off to play in the sun...

--

ds